Petition filed to reinstate 18 pregnant police recruits dismissed from Kiganjo
The National Police College, Kiganjo. PHOTO | Kipchumba Murkomen/Facebook
Audio By Vocalize
A petition has been filed before the Employment and Labour Relations Court in Nyeri seeking the reinstatement of 18 female police recruits dismissed from the National Police College, Kiganjo, allegedly solely on the basis of pregnancy.
In the petition filed by Peter Agoro and John Wangai against
the National Police Service (NPS) Inspector General, the National Police Service
Commission (NPSC) and the Attorney General, the two argue that the dismissals are
unconstitutional, discriminatory and violate the affected recruits’ rights to
equality, dignity, fair labour practices and fair administrative action.
According to court documents, the petitioners argue that the
18 women were among approximately 10,000 recruits selected during the
nationwide police recruitment exercise conducted in November 2025 and had
already reported to the National Police College Kiganjo for basic training.
The petition states that upon reporting to the college, all
female recruits were subjected to mandatory pregnancy tests, after which the 18
recruits who tested positive were dismissed from the programme.
The petitioners argue that the affected recruits were
already pregnant before joining the college and did not conceive while
undergoing training.
They contend that there is no law, regulation or publicly
gazetted policy providing for the automatic dismissal of female recruits on
grounds of pregnancy.
“The blanket application of pregnancy as an automatic
disqualifier for female police recruits is discriminatory on its face,” the
petition states, adding that no equivalent sanction exists for male recruits in
comparable medical or physiological circumstances.
The petitioners further fault the respondents for allegedly
failing to consider less restrictive alternatives such as deferment of
training, temporary leave or re-admission in a future intake.
The case cites constitutional provisions including Articles
27, 28, 41, 43 and 47, which guarantee equality, dignity, fair labour
practices, reproductive health rights and fair administrative action.
The petitioners also rely on Section 5 of the Employment
Act, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of sex or pregnancy in
recruitment and employment matters.
They further argue that the dismissals violate Kenya’s
obligations under international treaties, including the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the Maputo
Protocol.
Among the orders sought, the petitioners want the court to
declare the dismissals unconstitutional, compel the reinstatement of the
recruits into the next available police training intake after delivery and
postpartum recovery, and direct the police service to develop and gazette a
constitutionally compliant policy on pregnancy during police recruitment and
training.
They are also seeking orders barring further dismissal of recruits solely on grounds of pregnancy pending the formulation of such a policy framework.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!