How East African traders are losing billions to a broken cross-border payment system
A panel discussion by business leaders during a forum convened by global payments firm Ebury under the theme ‘Cross-Border Payments: Opportunities & Challenges in Africa.’
Audio By Vocalize
Every time a small trader in Eldoret pays a supplier in Dar es
Salaam, the money travels to New York first. That single fact, raised at a
high-level cross-border payments forum in Nairobi on Friday, captures the
absurdity of doing business across East Africa in 2026.
Despite sharing borders, cultures, and, in many cases,
languages, traders across the region are still forced to settle transactions in
US dollars, routed through American correspondent banks, incurring fees and
delays that directly eat into their margins.
The forum, convened by global payments firm Ebury under the
theme ‘Cross-Border Payments: Opportunities & Challenges in Africa’,
brought together business leaders, bankers, and trade facilitation experts to
confront a problem that costs ordinary traders, from market vendors to
mid-sized manufacturers, time, money, and opportunity every single day. Akshay
Grover, Managing Director, Africa, Ebury, took charge of the event moderation.
Few voices carried more weight on the subject than Vimal Shah,
Co-Founder and Chairman of Bidco Group, one of East Africa's largest consumer
goods manufacturers. "Moving products across East Africa is where the
nightmare begins," Shah said, describing how a company with competitive
products and regional ambitions is perpetually held back by fragmented markets,
high tariffs, and a payments architecture that was not built with African
traders in mind.
Bidco operates across a market of over 300 million people. Yet
despite the existence of East African Community trade agreements designed to
ease commerce, Shah painted a picture that many traders in the room knew all
too well, one of bureaucratic delays, punishing costs, and a system that
benefits intermediaries far more than the people actually moving goods.
"We only do dollars," he said plainly. "The
transaction is settled in New York." For mama mboga sourcing goods across
the border, for a hardware dealer importing materials from Uganda, or for a
logistics operator moving containers from Mombasa to Kigali, the impact is the
same: more cost, more friction, less profit.
Makabelo Malumane, Managing Director and Head of Transaction
Banking at Standard Chartered Bank, acknowledged the structural problem
directly, saying the region is caught in a dollar trap. Nearly every
significant cross-border transaction in East Africa, regardless of the
countries involved, is denominated and settled in US dollars. That means
exchange rate risk, correspondent banking fees, and processing delays that can
stretch from hours to days.
"How do we get from the dollar fix in every
transaction?" she posed, a question that resonated deeply with the traders
and financiers in the room. Her institution's response has been to work through
partnerships, extending balance sheet capacity by collaborating with other financial
players to reach businesses that traditional banking has long underserved.
She also pointed to Kenya's newly enacted Virtual Asset
Service Providers Act, 2025, as a potential mechanism to unlock faster, more
efficient payment rails for the continent, a regulatory development that
signals the government is finally serious about modernising the financial
system.
Kennedy Osano, Senior Key Accounts Director for Africa at
Ebury, put the structural problem in even sharper relief. The biggest gaps, he
argued, are market and currency fragmentation, because most African and East
African currencies are not directly convertible with one another.
“There is a regulatory and compliance misalignment, with each
country’s central bank operating under its own mandate, creating a patchwork of
conflicting rules that makes every cross-border transaction more complicated
and costly than it needs to be,” Osano added.
He stated that it is a diagnosis explaining why, despite all
the trade agreements and political goodwill, a trader moving goods from Nairobi
to Kampala still faces a system not designed with them in mind.
While the financial architecture grapples with currency
problems, physical bottlenecks remain just as crippling for ordinary traders.
Duncan Onyango, CEO of Trade Catalyst Africa, brought practical urgency to the
conversation. His organisation is working directly with governments to redesign
how goods physically move across borders, starting with two of East Africa's
busiest crossing points, Busia and Malaba.
"We are advocating for the express movement of
commodities across borders," he said. The vision is a system where
compliant traders with pre-cleared documentation can move through border points
without stopping, using smart gate technology that automates verification and
flags only those requiring mandatory inspection.
Mr. Onyango said that studies have been completed, border
points have been identified, and that the project is now entering the
feasibility stage. For the tens of thousands of traders who lose days and
perishable goods, to queues at Busia and Malaba every year, this cannot come
fast enough.
The conversation turned sharper when Vimal Shah raised a
question that many in Kenya's business community quietly ask but rarely say
aloud: why are so few local companies listing on the Nairobi Securities
Exchange?
For many businesses, the perception is that the disadvantages
of going public outweigh the benefits, regulatory complexity, disclosure
requirements, and a capital markets system that has not always delivered for
local companies.
But Shah was equally candid about another barrier: the sheer
inaccessibility of credit. "The reason you are not lending to many people
is because of your rates," he told the financial institutions in the room.
High interest rates, slow approval processes, and mountains of paperwork have
pushed many Kenyan businesses toward foreign financial hubs, particularly
Dubai, where money moves faster and with considerably less friction.
Technology, he argued, offers Kenya a way out. "AI
teaches us how to use technology to do things online and, in less time,"
he said. "Approval processes are difficult and take a long time in Kenya.
This explains why other countries in the region depend on Dubai," Shah added.
Perhaps the most immediately actionable idea to emerge from
the forum was Shah's call for a unified, government-backed KYC, or ‘Know Your
Customer’, system. Today, a business owner opening accounts at multiple banks
must submit the same documents to each institution separately: identity cards,
PIN certificates, business registration papers, and more. It is duplicative,
time-consuming, and a particular burden on small traders and women-owned
businesses with limited administrative capacity.
"Why can we not have documents and information
shared?" Shah asked. "That is where the government comes in to
help." The proposal is simple in concept: a centralised digital identity
system that allows a trader to verify once and be recognised across all
financial institutions. In a country where mobile penetration is among the
highest on the continent, the infrastructure for such a system is closer than
it might seem.
Elizabeth Irungu, CEO, ABSA Asset Management Limited, offered
a perspective that spoke directly to the psychology of East Africa's trading
class. "The risk appetite is there," she said. "But the appetite
for loss is not." It is a nuance that policy makers and fund managers
often miss.
East African traders are not risk-averse; they take enormous
risks every single day, moving goods across challenging terrain, extending
informal credit, and navigating volatile currencies. What they lack is a
financial system willing to absorb some of that risk alongside them.
She called for greater diversification in the fund management
space, more products, more options, and more institutions willing to meet
traders where they are, rather than designing products for an idealised
customer who does not represent the majority of people driving commerce across
the region.
East Africa's cross-border trade story is not ultimately one
of failure. It is one of enormous, documented, and largely unrealised
potential. The region has trade agreements. It has a young, tech-savvy
population. It has a mobile money infrastructure that is the envy of the world.
Kenya now has a regulatory framework for virtual assets. Smart
gate projects are advancing toward implementation. What is missing is the speed
of execution that matches the urgency felt by the traders, the farmers, the
small manufacturers, and the logistics operators who cannot wait for the next
policy paper.
As Shah puts it, surveying a region of 300 million people
connected by borders that should be bridges, the market is there, the products
are there, and the people are ready. The system just needs to catch up.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!