Amnesty Kenya’s Irungu Houghton resigns from protest victims panel
Amnesty International Kenya Executive Director Irungu Houghton during a past engagement in his office. PHOTO | COURTESY
Audio By Vocalize
Amnesty International Kenya Executive Director Irungu Houghton has formally resigned from President William Ruto’s Panel of Experts on Compensation of Victims of Protests and Riots with immediate effect, lamenting what he describes as a material alteration of the legal basis for the panel’s continued existence.
Houghton’s
decision, communicated in a letter to Prof. Makau Mutua - chairperson of the
panel - on Friday, follows President Ruto’s January 5, 2026 extension of the
panel’s mandate by 180 days.
This
despite a December 4, 2025 ruling by the Kerugoya High Court that declared the
panel unconstitutional and affirmed that compensation for human rights
violations properly resides with the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights
(KNCHR).
In
his resignation letter, Houghton reflects the constitutional tension that has
dogged the panel since its formation.
“I
write to formally tender my resignation from the Panel of Experts with
immediate effect. My decision follows the President’s 5 January 2026 extension
of the Panel’s mandate for a further 180 days despite the 4 December 2025
ruling of the Kerugoya High Court,” he stated.
He
argues that the High Court’s decision “materially alters both the legal basis
and institutional legitimacy of the Panel’s continued existence. As a
constitutionalist, I am obligated to respect judicial determinations and act in
a manner that safeguards the integrity of independent institutions.”
Houghton’s
resignation is the culmination of developments that began in September 2025,
when he suspended his participation in the panel after the High Court
temporarily halted its operations pending a legal challenge to its
constitutional standing.
At
that time, he stated: “For the avoidance of any public doubt, I immediately
suspended my participation in the Panel of Experts ... in accordance with
Monday’s order by the High Court and my respect for the rule of law,
constitution and judicial oversight.”
At
the time of that suspension, Houghton made it clear that he had not
participated in any panel meetings beyond the swearing-in and would refrain
from duties until the court provided a pathway forward.
Houghton
further disavowed an application filed on December 15, 2025, seeking to stay
the High Court’s ruling, saying his name had been erroneously included without
his consent or consultation.
“I
was neither consulted nor do I support the December 15 application to stay the
court ruling,” he wrote, adding that he “did not enter appearance when listed
as an interested party.”
He
also referenced his own public commentary from December 6, 2025 where he urged
full compliance with the court’s determination that KNCHR, not a presidential
panel, should lead compensation efforts.
Despite
his departure, Houghton took pains to underscore his ongoing solidarity with
victims of state violence.
“I
remain grateful for the opportunity to explore this avenue for truth, justice
and compensation for victims of state violence while expressing their
constitutional right to assembly. The victims’ families’ cry for
accountability, justice, and reparations has anchored my personal conscience
throughout this journey,” he said.
But
he insisted that fidelity to the Constitution, the rule of law and
institutional accountability must take precedence over expediency; a stance
that, in his view, now lies outside the panel’s current legal footing.
Houghton
concluded by urging all stakeholders to remain unwavering in pursuit of justice
in coherence with the Constitution and the recent court judgment.
The
panel was sworn in September 2025 to advise the Presidency on reparations for
victims of protests and demonstrations, including police brutality incidents
stretching back years.
However,
its work was mired in constitutional challenges almost from inception. A High
Court injunction the same month halted its operations, prompting Houghton’s
initial suspension.
Then,
in December 2025, the High Court went further, declaring the presidential panel
unconstitutional and affirming that KNCHR is the statutory body mandated to
handle investigations and redress for human rights violations under Article 59
of the Constitution.
President
Ruto moved to extend the panel and, according to government statements, pursue
compliance and legal clarity, even lodging an appeal while maintaining
compensation efforts.


Leave a Comment