Supreme Court refers NSSF Act case back to Court of Appeal
The Supreme Court
has returned a petition challenging the National Social Security Fund (NSSF)
Act 2013 to the Court of Appeal citing wrongful assumption of the Employment
and Labour Relations Court jurisdiction.
In the judgement
rendered by a seven judge-bench led by Chief Justice Martha Koome, the
apex court stated that the appellate court erred in their finding that the
Labour court has no powers to hear the case challenging the hiking of NSSF
contributions from Ksh.200 to Ksh.2,000.
In the case that
was filed by the Kenya Tea Growers Association, Agricultural Employers
Association and the County Pensioners Association, the Supreme Court further
overturned the appellate court's interpretation of the jurisdiction of the
Employment and Labor Relations Court while further clarifying that the Labour
Court holds explicit jurisdiction to adjudicate on the constitutionality of a
statute.
According to the
appellate court, the issue fell squarely within the jurisdiction of the High
Court under Article 165(3) of the Constitution, and in any event, the dispute
did not arise from an employer-employee relation as prescribed in Section 12 of
the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act.
During the hearing
of the petition, the appellants argued that their members had long-standing
adequate pension and social security schemes with their employers which were
more advantageous than those proposed by the NSSF Act 2013.
The petitioners
further asserted that they would be overburdened and lose their years’
contributions to the existing pension schemes.
They likewise
challenged the constitutionality of the Act, citing insufficient public
participation, the mandatory registration of employees under the fund unlike
the previous NSSF Act which exempted members of existing pension schemes from
registration, and the failure to involve the Senate in the enactment process
despite the obligation for county governments to make payments to the fund.
They similarly
decried granting regulatory powers to the NSSF Board of Trustees instead of the
Retirement Benefits Authority, enhancing social security benefits exclusively
for employed individuals, thus discriminating against the unemployed and
allowing the Cabinet Secretary for Labour and Social Security to determine the
board's remuneration, a responsibility typically assigned to the Salaries and
Remuneration Commission (SRC);
Conferring a
monopoly on the NSSF Board for the provision of pension and social security
services was also cited by the petitioners.
At the Court of Appeal,
Justices Hannah Okwengu, Mohamed Warsame and John Mativo ruled that the NSSF
Act 2013 was legal and nothing stops the government from implementing
amendments captured in it.
The government's
plan was however cut short by Labour Court judges Nduma Nderi, Hellen Wasilwa
and Monica Mbaru in September last year when they declared the act illegal and
unconstitutional.
Want to send us a story? SMS to 25170 or WhatsApp 0743570000 or Submit on Citizen Digital or email wananchi@royalmedia.co.ke
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a Comment