Petition filed to stop gov't funding for Bayern vs Ajax match at Raila Odinga stadium

In an application filed by a group of Kenyan citizens and human rights defenders, the petitioners want the court to issue conservatory orders restraining the government and other respondents from authorising, allocating, releasing or spending public money towards the highly anticipated football match pending the hearing and determination of the case.

The petitioners are also seeking orders compelling the respondents to disclose, within seven days, the full sponsorship agreements and contracts entered into with the two European clubs or their representatives.

They want the government to reveal the identities of corporate sponsors, their respective financial contributions and obligations, as well as a detailed breakdown of the anticipated expenditure on appearance fees, travel, accommodation, security, insurance, hospitality and other logistical arrangements.

In the court papers, the petitioners cite a reported cost of five million euros, equivalent to approximately 724.6 million shillings, for hosting the two clubs, saying the figure has not been independently verified and requires official clarification.

They argue that despite assurances that the event will be commercially sponsored and self-sustaining, there is insufficient information on the financial arrangements and whether the government will incur direct or indirect obligations.

The petitioners further want the court to preserve all financial records, procurement documents, sponsorship agreements, contracts, correspondence, approvals and Cabinet memoranda relating to the event.

They argue that the public has a constitutional right to know how public resources are being utilised, particularly where government institutions and publicly funded infrastructure.

Citing Articles 35 and 201 of the Constitution, the petitioners maintain that access to information held by the State and accountability in the use of public funds are essential principles of public finance management.

They insist that their case is not intended to oppose sports development or international sporting partnerships but to ensure transparency, value for money and compliance with the law.

The application follows the President's announcement on October 28, 2026, of the planned friendly match between the two European football clubs.

The petitioners want the application certified as urgent and heard in the first instance.