Nairobi court denies man accused of threatening magistrate bail
The accused, Francis Kamau Karanja, appears before Milimani Law Courts on October 8, 2026. PHOTO | DZUYA WALTER | CITIZEN DIGITAL
Audio By Vocalize
A Nairobi court has denied bail to Francis Kamau Karanja, who was charged at the Milimani Law Courts with cyber harassment over a message allegedly sent to a magistrate.
The court ruled
that the allegations raised concerns about possible interference with witnesses
if the accused person were released on bail.
Karanja had denied
the charge of cyber harassment contrary to Section 27(1)(a), as read with
Section 27(2), of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act.
The prosecution
alleges that on September 28, 2026, Karanja sent a message to a mobile phone
number registered in the name of Magistrate Margaret Murage.
According to the
charge sheet, the message, which allegedly referred to the handling of a case
involving Gabriel Saka, contained words likely to cause apprehension or fear of
violence to the judicial officer.
Opposing his
release on bond, the prosecution argued that the case was extraordinary because
the alleged victim is a judicial officer.
The State told the
court that the alleged message had caused the magistrate to avoid using her
residence and vehicle, leaving her living in fear.
The prosecution
urged the court to consider the Judiciary Bail and Bond Policy Guidelines,
particularly the need to protect victims and prevent possible interference with
witnesses when determining whether to release an accused person on bail.
Karanja's lawyer,
Muriithi Mbaabu, had urged the court to grant his client reasonable and lenient
bail terms.
The defence argued
that Karanja had been denied police bail without being informed of the reasons
for his arrest.
He was initially
taken to Kilimani Police Station on Tuesday but was not arraigned that day. He
was subsequently presented before the Kibera Law Courts on Wednesday, where
plea-taking was deferred after the prosecution sought to have the matter
transferred to Milimani.
The Kibera court
directed that the accused be presented before Milimani Court 1 for plea-taking,
noting that proceeding with the case in Kibera could raise allegations of bias.
The ruling denying
Karanja bail means he will remain in custody as the case proceeds, subject to
any further orders by the court.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!