'Michael': All the hits, half the truth...but a Jaafar Jackson masterclass

After years of anticipation, speculation, and debate, the ‘Michael’ biopic has finally premiered. The release feels less like a typical film opening and more like a global moment, with fans gathering to celebrate the legacy of the King of Pop, Michael Jackson. But beyond the excitement and nostalgia, one question has followed this film from the very beginning: did the man chosen to play him truly earn the role?

Directed by Antoine Fuqua, the film traces Michael Jackson’s journey from his early days in the Jackson 5 to his rise as a global superstar. It leans heavily into the music and performance, recreating iconic moments that defined his career. However, the story deliberately focuses on his peak years, stopping in the late 1980s before the more controversial chapters of his life. The film’s ending has especially sparked conversation, as it closes on a cliffhanger, hinting that there is more of the story yet to be told.

Casting Michael Jackson was no small task. In an interview, Antoine Fuqua revealed that the team spent over two years searching for someone who could embody not just his appearance, but his energy, voice, and presence. The role ultimately went to Jaafar Jackson his real-life nephew; a decision that immediately divided opinion. For some, it raised concerns about nepotism; for others, it felt like the most authentic choice.

The debate extended even within the Jackson family. While Prince Jackson has shown support for the project, Paris Jackson has reportedly expressed discomfort with how the story is handled, suggesting that the film lacks critical depth and feels somewhat sugar-coated. Still, Katherine Jackson publicly backed Jaafar, stating that he embodies her son a significant endorsement, from someone who knew Michael best.

Despite mixed reactions to the film itself, critics have largely agreed on one point: Jaafar Jackson delivers. His performance has been described as strikingly accurate, particularly in the musical sequences where he captures Michael Jackson’s signature style and stage presence. In an interview with Jimmy Fallon, Jaafar shared insight into his preparation, explaining that he worked with a coach over a multi-year period and that earning the role was far from a traditional audition process. Even some negative reviews of the film acknowledge that his portrayal is one of its strongest elements, suggesting that while the film may play it safe, the performance does not.

Audience reactions, however, tell a slightly different story. Early responses from fans at the premiere have been overwhelmingly positive, with many treating the film as a celebration rather than a critical examination. This contrast highlights a clear divide while critics are looking for depth and honesty, fans are embracing the nostalgia and the music that defined Michael Jackson’s legacy.

As ‘Michael’ heads into its global, the conversation continues to grow. Jaafar Jackson may have had the advantage of the Jackson name, but he also carried the weight of portraying one of the most iconic figures in music history. Whether or not he deserved the role depends on who you ask, but what remains clear is that his performance has become one of the most talked-about aspects of the film.

And as a fan, after watching the movie, it’s hard to ignore the experience the film delivers. ‘Michael’ feels like a 10 out of 10, especially in how it takes viewers through different stages of his life, moving across years and moments that shaped him into the legend we know today. The transitions between eras feel intentional and immersive, allowing us to grow with him, understand his journey, and connect with his artistry on a deeper level.

While it may not explore every controversy, it succeeds in celebrating his genius, his work ethic, and his undeniable impact. Michael Jackson remains one of the greatest entertainers of all time.