Pentagon Chief set to reassure South Korea amid North’s provocations

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin speaks during a news conference with South Korea's Minister of National Defense Lee Jong-sup at the Pentagon, Nov. 3, 2022, in Washington. PHOTO/COURTESY: VOA
- U.S. Defense Secretary is expected to meet South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on Monday, according to South Korean media.
- Earlier this month, Yoon made headlines when he said South Korea could demand the redeployment of U.S. nuclear weapons, or even develop its own nuclear arms, if its security situation with North Korea worsens.
South Korean concerns about
the U.S. nuclear umbrella are expected to be a major focus of U.S. Defense
Secretary Lloyd Austin’s upcoming trip to Seoul.
Austin, who arrives in the South Korean capital on Monday, is
expected to meet President Yoon Suk Yeol, according to South Korean media.
Earlier this month, Yoon made headlines when he said South
Korea could demand the redeployment of U.S. nuclear weapons, or even develop
its own nuclear arms, if its security situation with North Korea worsens.
Yoon later walked back those comments. However, the situation
underscores growing South Korean worries over North Korea’s quickly expanding
nuclear arsenal, as well as questions about the long-term defense commitment of
its ally, the United States.
Deputy Pentagon press secretary Sabrina Singh told a briefing
Thursday that Austin's trip will highlight “our commitment to the region,”
saying the U.S. commitment to South Korea remains “rock solid.”
Austin’s visit will be closely watched to see whether he
addresses Yoon’s comments about nuclear weapons.
“He might make some rhetorical gesture indicating gently in
public, and certainly much more strongly behind the scenes, that it would be
undesirable for South Korea to have its own nuclear deterrent,” said Mason
Richey, an associate professor at South Korea's Hankuk University of Foreign
Studies.
“But I think he would do so in a way that would not be
intended to publicly irritate South Korea or to call into question South
Korea’s sovereignty or autonomy,” Richey said.
Instead, Austin may highlight U.S.-South Korean efforts to
expand defense cooperation, he added.
In recent months, Washington and Seoul have increased joint
military drills and agreed to the more frequent deployment of U.S. strategic
assets, such as nuclear-capable bombers and aircraft carriers, to the region
around the Korean Peninsula.
But Yoon, a conservative who embraces a more aggressive
approach to North Korea, thinks more should be done to keep up with North
Korean nuclear advancements.
As a presidential candidate, he briefly embraced the possibility
of the United States returning tactical nuclear weapons to South Korea.
The United States removed its nuclear weapons from South Korea in the early 1990s.
Instead, South Korea is
protected by the U.S. nuclear umbrella, under which Washington vows to use all
its capabilities, including nuclear weapons, to defend its ally.
Yoon last month suggested such ideas are outdated and that South Korea needs a bigger role in its own defense.
As an alternative, Yoon said
he envisioned new levels of nuclear cooperation that would have the same effect
as nuclear sharing.
South Korea’s concerns are
driven in large part by North Korea’s rapid expansion of its nuclear weapons
program.
In 2022, North Korea launched more than 90 missiles, including
short-range weapons designed to evade South Korea’s missile defense systems and
long-range weapons that could hit the U.S. mainland.
In a year-end speech, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un vowed
to “exponentially” increase production of nuclear warheads and to develop yet
another new intercontinental ballistic missile.
U.S. and South Korean officials have also warned for months
that North Korea has finished preparations for another nuclear test.
The developments have rattled many in Seoul, who fear the
United States may not come to the defense of South Korea if North Korea has the
ability to destroy U.S. cities.
A growing number of
Washington-based analysts agree that the United States should shore up its
defense commitment to South Korea.
In a report last week, the Center for Strategic and
International Studies said the allies should consider “tabletop planning
exercises for the possible redeployment of U.S. nuclear weapons to South
Korea."
While the CSIS report said the United States should not under
current circumstances deploy tactical nuclear weapons, it suggested other
steps, including the creation of a “framework for joint nuclear planning,”
similar to a U.S. arrangement with NATO.
The report mentioned the possibility of "the continuous presence in the region of either U.S. submarines equipped with nuclear cruise missiles or strategic bombers.
It also said South Korea could
acquire dual-capable aircraft, which can conduct nuclear or conventional
missions.
It is not clear whether U.S. and South Korean officials are
discussing any of those proposals.
But Sydney Seiler, the national intelligence officer for
North Korea at the U.S. National Intelligence Council, on Thursday praised the
CSIS report as “excellent,” saying it laid out a “very persuasive case … on how
to maintain deterrence in this environment.”
“It was compelling,” Seiler said during an online forum hosted by CSIS. “And we go back to [the fact that] deterrence has worked for seven decades,” he said. “Why would deterrence not work going forward?”
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a Comment