JSC condemns attack on judges over bail, bond decisions
File image of Judicial Service Commission (JSC) Secretary Winfridah Mokaya | Photo: JSC/X
Audio By Vocalize
The Judicial Service
Commission (JSC) has condemned what it describes as an “escalating trend” of
public vilification and personal attacks against judges, particularly over bail
and bond rulings.
In a Thursday statement by its secretary, Winfridah Mokaya, the commission expressed “grave
concern” over reactions to recent decisions made by the Nanyuki and Kahawa Law
Courts.
In Nanyuki, some 111 people arrested over the July 7 Saba Saba protests
in Laikipia County were released on a Ksh.50,000 cash bail each, after being
charged with malicious damage to property.
Some were reportedly arrested on the eve
of the demos.
In Kahawa, meanwhile, 37
youth who were last week charged with terrorism-related
offences over the June 25 and July 7 protests were on Wednesday released on a
cash bail of Ksh.50,000 or an alternative bond of Ksh.200,000 each.
Critics, including former Chief Justice
David Maraga, have taken issue with the pressing of terrorism charges against
protesters, terming it a way to suppress dissent.
On social media, some
users have called for the publicization of the personal information and contact
details of the magistrates, judges, and prosecutors behind the charges they
call “trumped-up” and “nonsensical”.
But Mokaya has warned
that such attacks undermine judicial independence and erode public trust in the
administration of justice.
“These decisions are
guided by the Constitution, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Judiciary’s bail
and bond policy guidelines,” Mokaya said, adding that judicial officers do not
act arbitrarily.
JSC held that
dissatisfied parties have the right to appeal or seek reviews through legal
channels instead of resorting to personal attacks.
Mokaya said necessary
security arrangements are in place for judicial officers through the Judiciary
Police Unit.
“The commission
reaffirms its unwavering commitment to defending the decisional independence of
all judicial officers and judges,” she added.


Leave a Comment