OPINION: What SDT, High Court rulings mean for embattled FKF boss Hussein amid insurance allegations

Mark Kinyanjui
By Mark Kinyanjui April 29, 2026 02:25 (EAT)
Add as a Preferred Source on Google
OPINION: What SDT, High Court rulings mean for embattled FKF boss Hussein amid insurance allegations

FKF President Hussein Mohammed speaks during a meeting with leaders of various security agencies to appreciate their excellent work during CHAN2024 on September 9, 2025. Photo by FKF

Vocalize Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Vocalize

On the evening of Friday, April 24th, shockwaves were sent all over Kenyan football when a section of the Football Kenya Federation’s National Executive Council (NEC) members resolved to oust President Hussein Mohammed over a Ksh. 47.7 million insurance scandal.

 

The move came days after a local daily newspaper reported that both Mohammed and NEC member Abdullayi Yusuf were involved in insurance fraud during the historic 2024 African Nations Championships (CHAN) tournament which Kenya co-hosted alongside Tanzania and Uganda last August. 

 

The NEC members had also recommended a forensic audit of FKF financial accounts.


However, on Monday, April 27, the Sports Disputes Tribunal moved to temporarily keep the FKF boss in his seat pending further investigations.  

 

Furthermore, McDonald Mariga’s appointment as "Acting President" was suspended until at least May 5, 2026, when the matter will be mentioned. The interim orders also blocked attempts to freeze FKF bank accounts.

 

Regardless of the reprieve, Mohammed’s reputation now stands on the brink. As investigations continue, and with the public keen to get to the bottom of the whole saga in need to see the ugly matter come to an end, Citizen Digital breaks down what the situation portends for Hussein Mohammed and the local football scene. 

 

How exactly did things get to this point for a man who pledged to give the federation a fresh-clean start pillared on transparency and accountability?


The Ksh42.7M Riskwell Scandal

 

Shortly before the start of CHAN 2024, Ksh. 42.7 million was allegedly paid to Riskwell Insurance Brokers Limited for tournament insurance in July of 2025.

Nine months down the line, the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA) came out and stated that Riskwell was not licensed to broker insurance.

Furthermore, the firm was allegedly registered just weeks before the tournament, leading to claims of a "ghost" policy where no actual insurance was procured. 

 

A few days later, NEC convened a meeting in the alleged absence of the President, and their resolutions to ask him to step aside prompted a visibly frustrated Mohammed into dismissing the allegations.

 

In a statement he released to the media on Saturday morning, Mohammed dismissed the move as a plot to “run a sustained smear campaign” against him in the meeting he termed “irregular, unlawful, and unconstitutional”.


“This is a desperate act of revenge for the steadfast position I have taken in the past,” Mohammed stated.


“I am willing to cooperate with any investigative agency on any matter should I be required to do so.”

 While President Hussein Mohammed characterizes the move as an "attempted coup," NEC member Robert Macharia insists the process is rooted in constitutional duty and the need for investigation.

"As far as we are concerned, we have followed procedure. We have followed the Constitution, the FIFA statutes, and the CAF statutes," Macharia stated in a press conference last Saturday.

 "Anyone who has a problem with that knows there is an appellate process. We have complied with the statutes that require us to ask the President to step aside."

Macharia emphasized that the move is not a personal vendetta but an administrative necessity triggered by the insurance exposé.

"This is not about personalities; this is about a legal process. We believe in innocence until proven guilty, but there is what we call a prima facie- enough evidence to proceed case.

 “The media has raised questions that need answering, and we must leave that to the respective investigation agencies."

SDT, High Court’s Move to Keep Mohammed in Office Temporarily

 

On Monday, April 27, 2026, the Sports Disputes Tribunal (SDT) issued an urgent directive that has frozen the ouster in its tracks.

 

The tribunal certified a case filed by FKF Machakos branch chairman Ahmed Abdi Mohammed as urgent and issued a temporary injunction halting all resolutions passed by the NEC on April 24. 

 

This move came a day after Mohammed, alongside the implicated NEC member Yusuf and CEO Dennis Gicheru held a meeting with all 48 branch chairmen. This was a calculated political move.

While the NEC (the board) can suspend a President provisionally, only the Congress (the shareholders) has the power to permanently dismiss him under Article 24(c).  

 

By securing their public support, Mohammed is showing that even if he loses in the boardroom, he still owns the "ballot box."

 

FIFA Enters Fray


Perhaps more dangerous for the faction of the NEC is the intervention from Zurich. FIFA has written to the FKF (dated April 26) demanding answers by May 1, 2026.

 

In a letter signed by Chief Member Associations Officer Elkhan Mammadov, FIFA is specifically investigating whether the NEC violated Article 41(4) of the FKF Statutes, which guarantees an official the right to defend themselves before being suspended.

 

FIFA wants proof of how the meeting was convened, the agenda, and the voting records. If FIFA deems the process unconstitutional, they could nullify the NEC’s move entirely.

Mariga moved to reply to the inquest by FIFA in a letter seen by Citizen Digital pledging to meet all requirements by the stated deadline.

The constitutional clash that will make or break Hussein Mohammed

 

The battle hinges on two conflicting views of the 2022 FKF Constitution. Mohammed referenced article 38.

 According to the stipulation, the FKF President must convene meetings. If the NEC wants a meeting, they must wait 21 days for the President to call it. Mohammed says he never received the request.

 NEC might however reference article 41 clause 2 of the constitution, which can give it the power to “dismiss a person of a body provisionally”.

NEC could also argue that logically, a sitting President cannot convene a meeting to discuss his removal from office.


The Bottom Line

 

Hussein Mohammed has won a significant legal battle at the SDT, and the procedural errors made by the NEC—specifically failing to give him the right to a defense—could end up even saving his presidency. 

 

Mohammed even managed to gain a  conservatory order by the high court of Kiambu on April 28, effectively daring  his detractors by attaching a "Penal Notice" that threatens jail time for anyone who interferes with his office.

However, while the law has temporarily saved him, it has not yet cleared his name of the Riskwell insurance allegations. On Monday, the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) visited FKF offices to make inquiries over the saga.

As the NEC prepares its response for May 8, the shadow of a FIFA suspension hangs over the country. Kenya's ability to host AFCON 2027 now depends on whether the federation can survive a war where the President is protected by the courts, but the accounts are haunted by a Sh42M ghost. 

 

The views expressed here are not representative of www.citizen.digital or Royal Media Services.

 

Join the Discussion

Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.

Moderation applies

Sign In to Publish

No comments yet

This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!