Nairobi lawyer facing 10 criminal charges released after High Court blocks prosecution
Lawyer Benard Odero Okello appears at the Kibera Law Courts on September 11, 2026. PHOTO | DZUYA WALTER | CITIZEN DIGITAL
Audio By Vocalize
A Nairobi lawyer on Friday appeared before the Kibera Law
Courts to face 10 criminal counts, including forgery, uttering false documents,
resisting arrest and assaulting police officers.
The lawyer, Benard Odero Okello, however, did not take a plea
to the charges after the court was informed that the High Court had issued
orders stopping his prosecution. He was released unconditionally.
According to the charge sheet, the prosecution alleges that
Okello forged signatures on documents filed in ELRC Cause No. E068 of 2022, a
dispute involving the Kenya County Government Workers Union.
The first three counts accuse him of forging the signatures of
Calvince Okello, Festus Ngari and Benson Oliang’a Oriaro on a Change of
Signatory and Fee Note Agreement.
The alleged offences are said to have occurred on September
17, 2023, at an unknown place in Kenya, with the prosecution alleging that
Okello intended to deceive the Employment and Labour Relations Court.
A fourth count accuses the lawyer of uttering a false document
contrary to Section 353 of the Penal Code.
The prosecution alleges that on November 19, 2024, at Milimani
in Nairobi, Okello knowingly and fraudulently presented the alleged forged
Change of Signatory and Fee Note Agreement before the Employment and Labour
Relations Court during party-to-party taxation proceedings in ELRC Cause No.
E068 of 2022.
The charge sheet contains further allegations concerning a
claim against the Nairobi County government over alleged failure to pay full
salaries and remit deductions for branch members for October and December 2021.
Counts five and six accuse Okello of allegedly forging the
signatures of Benson Oliang’a Oriaro and Festus Ngari on documents relating to
the claim.
Count seven alleges that he subsequently uttered the document
before the Employment and Labour Relations Court during party-to-party taxation
proceedings, allegedly presenting it as genuine.
The remaining three charges relate to the circumstances
surrounding his arrest on September 10, 2026, at Wesley House in Westlands,
Nairobi.
According to the charge sheet, Okello resisted arrest by
refusing to be handcuffed, struggling and attempting to escape from police
officers who were acting in the execution of their duties.
The officers named in the charge sheet are CPL James Munyao,
PC Simon Mwaniki, PC(DR) Stephen Ndirangu and PC(W) Josephine Thuo.
The ninth count alleges that Okello wilfully assaulted PC
Simon Mwaniki while the officer was executing his duties, while the tenth count
contains a similar allegation concerning PC Stephen Ndirangu.
But even as the prosecution sought to proceed with the
criminal case, Okello had moved to the High Court seeking protection against
his arrest and prosecution.
Justice Bahati Mwamuye issued interim orders in chambers after
considering Okello’s Notice of Motion dated September 11, 2026.
The High Court, also joined the Kenya County Government
Workers Union as an interested party in the proceedings.
The court then issued a conservatory order restraining the
respondents, pending the inter partes hearing and determination of the
application, from summoning, arresting, detaining, arraigning, charging or
prosecuting Okello, or any advocate, staff member or agent of Odero &
Partners Advocates, in relation to matters touching on instructions from or
transactions involving the Kenya County Government Workers Union.
Justice Mwamuye also ordered the immediate and unconditional
release of Okello, and any advocate, staff member or agent of Odero &
Partners Advocates who may be detained in connection with matters involving the
union, including the disputed Fee Agreement.
The petitioner was directed to serve the respondents and the
interested party with the application, petition and court order and file an
affidavit of service by close of business on September 14, 2026.
The respondents and the interested party were directed to
enter appearance and file and serve their respective responses to the
application and petition.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!