Malindi NG-CDF officials convicted in Ksh.19 million graft case
The two suspects before the Malindi Court. PHOTO | ODPP
Audio By Vocalize
A senior National Government Constituency Development Fund (NG-CDF) official and a private contractor have been convicted over the irregular award of a Ksh.19 million public construction tender in Malindi.
The Chief Magistrate's court found Wachu Omar
Abdallah, the NG-CDF Malindi Fund Account Manager, and Robert Katana Wanje, a
director of Multserve Contractors Limited, guilty after concluding that the
prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Magistrate Muniu ruled that the prosecution had presented
credible and consistent evidence through more than 10 witnesses, dismissing the
defence's case as weak and unconvincing.
“Abdallah was found guilty of willfully failing to comply
with procurement laws contrary to Section 45(2)(b), as read with Section 48 of
the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, 2003,” read a statement by the Office
of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
The court heard that Abdallah unlawfully awarded Multserve
Contractors Ltd a Ksh.19,007,539.60 tender for the construction of the Malindi Sub-County
Education Office Block between May 25 and May 29, 2018, without obtaining the
mandatory professional opinion required under the Public Procurement and Asset
Disposal Act, 2015.
He was convicted of wilfully failing to comply with
procurement laws under the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act and fined
Ksh.400,000 or, in default, sentenced to serve six years in prison.
Wanje was found guilty on three counts of forgery and one
count of uttering a false document after the court established that he forged
key tender documents, including a curriculum vitae, a craft certificate and
audited financial statements, before submitting them to the Tender Opening
Committee to secure the lucrative contract.
The contractor was fined Ksh.200,000 on each of the four
counts or, in default, sentenced to two years' imprisonment on each count, with
the custodial terms set to run concurrently.
The court granted both convicts 14 days to file an appeal
against the convictions and sentences.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!