Ichung’wah says Election Amendment Bill retains live-streaming of election results
National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah speaks in a past address. PHOTO | COURTESY
Audio By Vocalize
The National Assembly has dismissed reports of passing a bill that removed the mandatory livestreaming of election results from the Elections Act, explaining that the requirement was retained in the Elections (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 2024, following changes made by MPs.
In an explainer issued on Friday, October 23, Parliament
said it deleted Clause 22 of the Bill, which had proposed to repeal and recast
Section 39 of the Elections Act, thereby retaining the existing legal provision
requiring the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to
establish a mechanism for livestreaming results announced at polling stations.
The clarification follows public debate over the Bill, which the National Assembly passed on Friday with amendments, amid concerns
that the proposed changes could weaken public scrutiny of the electoral process
ahead of the 2027 General Election.
National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah
dismissed claims that Parliament had interfered with the livestreaming
requirement, accusing those spreading the reports of misleading Kenyans.
“The Bill from the Senate did not have anything to do with
livestreaming. Section 39(1G) of the Elections Act requires the IEBC to
establish a mechanism to livestream results announced at polling
stations. The streamed results are for public information only and shall not be
the basis for declaration by the Commission. That is the law as it is, and it
has not changed,” Ichung’wah said.
He maintained that neither the Senate nor the National
Assembly had made changes to the livestreaming provision, adding that the
legislative process was not yet complete.
“Let me tell those spreading that rumour online, and the
clueless and rudderless politicians who have a habit of misinforming Kenyans
through propaganda, that no changes have been made to election livestreaming by
either the Senate or the National Assembly,” he said.
“The Bill has not been finalised and has to return to the
Senate because it is a Senate Bill. Those spreading rumours and propaganda
should look for other jobs instead of inciting Kenyans.”
The controversy centres on Clause 22 of the Elections (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 2024, which sought to delete Section 39 of the Elections Act and replace it with a revised provision governing the determination, transmission and declaration of election results.
As initially passed by the Senate, the clause proposed
changes to the legal framework governing election results, including a
provision that did not expressly require the IEBC to livestream results
announcements at polling stations.
The National Assembly, however, said it deleted the clause
after considering public participation and a recent court judgment, leaving
Section 39 intact.
According to Parliament, the move was intended to preserve
the existing procedure for determining and declaring election results,
including the requirement for livestreaming.
The Bill also proposes changes to other aspects of electoral administration, including voter registration, political party nominations and the recall of elected representatives.
Livestreaming allows voters, political parties, journalists
and election observers to watch results being announced at polling stations and
compare the figures with those transmitted to tallying centres.
The requirement is distinct from electronic transmission of
results and the publication of polling-station results forms, which enable the
public to access election data after it has been transmitted or uploaded.
Former Law Society of Kenya President Faith Odhiambo took to social media amid the controversy, calling on Parliament to publish the final version of the Bill and clarify its
implications for electoral transparency.
In a statement posted on Facebook, Odhiambo said Kenyans
should be able to follow how votes translate into election results, rather than
simply relying on official declarations.
“In the published Bill, Clause 22 replaces Section 39
without expressly requiring livestreaming of results announced at polling
stations, while retaining electronic transmission and online publication of
results forms. That is not a ban on livestreaming,” she said.
Odhiambo nevertheless argued that transmitting results to
election officials and allowing citizens to watch their announcement serve
different purposes, urging Parliament to clarify whether the omission was
retained in the amendments approved by MPs.
She also cited previous court proceedings concerning the
livestreaming provision, arguing that electoral reforms should strengthen
public accountability rather than leave transparency dependent on institutional
discretion.
Meanwhile, the National Assembly said the Bill would return to the
Senate for consideration of the amendments made by MPs, in accordance with
Article 110(4) of the Constitution.
The clarification comes ahead of the 2027 General Election, with public scrutiny of electoral processes remaining a key issue in discussions surrounding reforms to the Elections Act.


Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!