Former Kisumu Speaker Onyango Oloo charged afresh in Ksh.4B corruption scandal
Former Kisumu County Assembly speaker Onyango Oloo.
Audio By Vocalize
Former Kisumu County Assembly speaker Onyango Oloo was on
Wednesday charged afresh over the Ksh.4.1 billion Lake Basin Development Authority
(LBDA) Mall scandal.
Oloo was charged alongside former Lake Basin Development
Managing Director Peter Abuok and 12 others.
They were charged with engaging in a project without prior
planning, willful failure to comply with the law relating to procurement, abuse
of office among other charges.
Meanwhile, three accused persons in the case, Zhang Jing,
John Zeyun Yang and Ederman Properties, have filed an application challenging
the charge sheet.
The court directed that they serve the other parties on
Wednesday.
The court was told that three accused persons in the case
have engaged the National Treasury PS, the Director of Public Prosecutions and
the Lake Basin Development Authority (LBDA) with the view of having the matter
resolved out of court.
Oloo was impeached in September 2019 after being accused of
abuse of office, unlawful suspension of MCAs and being linked to Lake Basin
Mall scandal.
The Ethics and Anti-corruption Commission (EACC) began investigations into the
scandal a complaint received in July 2015, that the cost of the LBDA mall had
been inflated from Ksh2.5 billion to Ksh4.1 billion.
In 2019, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions
said a lot of irregularities had been discovered following the investigation,
including collusion between some Board members of the LBDA and Erdemann
Properties Limited.
The directors of the company allegedly bribed Oloo with
Ksh.17 million and other properties in order to inflate the cost of the project
in the interest of the company.
George Omollo Odawa, a former chairman of the Finance and
Establishment Committee of the LBDA, was also brought up for allegations of
having received Ksh.12 million.
The LBDA management was further accused of awarding the
contract for the construction of the mall to one of the three companies that
had applied, even though neither was capacitated to carry through with the
contract.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!