Court of Appeal to rule on bid to lift orders blocking Ksh.205B Safaricom share sale
Pedestrians walk outside the Safaricom mobile phone customer care centre during the launch of its 5G internet service in the central business district of Nairobi, Kenya October 27, 2022. REUTERS
Audio By Vocalize
The Court of Appeal
will deliver its ruling on June 26, 2026 on an application by the State seeking
to overturn the High Court’s conservatory orders that have blocked the Ksh.205
billion government Safaricom stake sale.
Petitioners had
raised concerns over a last-minute change of the hearing date from June 29 to June
18, saying some parties were not properly served.
They also
questioned the transparency of the process, alleging an attempt to lift the
orders and allow the sale to proceed before the High Court’s final
determination on June 26. They said they will move to the Supreme Court if the Court
of Appeal lifts the orders.
Petitioner Tony Gachoka’s lead lawyer Kalonzo Musyoka on April 27 asked
the court to issue orders to stop the government from selling its 15 per cent stake in Safaricom to Vodacom, arguing that the planned transaction is
unconstitutional and threatens public interest.
Kalonzo argued that the proposed sale contravenes Article 209 of the
Constitution, which limits revenue measures and protects public resources from
irregular disposal.
He claimed that the transaction should be halted through conservatory
orders to preserve the status quo until the court fully hears and determines
the petition challenging the process.
Kalonzo argued that conservatory orders are constitutional remedies
granted based on the inherent merit of a case, especially where public interest
is involved, and insisted that all the three required thresholds were met.
According to him, these include public interest, constitutional values,
and the risk of irreparable harm if the sale is allowed to proceed.
He faulted the government for allegedly failing to conduct genuine public
participation before initiating the planned sale, saying the process lacked
transparency and excluded key stakeholders, including Members of Parliament and
ordinary Kenyans.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!