Blow to Gov't as High Court declares sale of Safaricom shares 'null and void'
File image of the Safaricom building.
Audio By Vocalize
A three-judge bench of the High Court has declared null and
void the government’s partial divestiture of its 15 per cent stake in
Safaricom, ruling that the process violated the Constitution and the law.
The court found that the decision to sell the government’s
stake was a public policy decision that required meaningful public
participation before it could be undertaken.
The judges held that neither the Cabinet nor the National
Assembly subjected the proposed sale to adequate public participation, rendering
the process unconstitutional.
The court further faulted the government for failing to
provide sufficient information to the public about the proposed transaction,
including the identity of the intended buyer.
The bench found that the government engaged in “unexplained
obscurity” over the identity of the proposed buyer, made misrepresentations and
concealed material information relating to the partial divestiture.
The judges said withholding or concealing material documents
during a public participation process undermines the constitutional principles
of transparency and accountability.
“Concealing or withholding material information and documents
during public participation violates constitutional transparency requirements
and invalidates the resulting policies or projects because it renders public
engagement a cosmetic formality rather than a meaningful exercise,” the court
ruled.
The court stressed that public participation must be
meaningful and informed, requiring the government to provide citizens with
adequate information to enable them to effectively participate in decisions
involving public assets.
The bench also found that the proposed sale, including arrangements
relating to the merger, takeover or transfer of the government’s Safaricom
shares, was contrary to the law.
Consequently, the court quashed all agreements, approvals and
arrangements relating to the sale, merger, takeover or transfer of the shares
to or involving any person or entity.
The court further ordered that the 15 per cent Safaricom
shareholding be restored to the Government of Kenya, to be held on behalf of
the people of Kenya.
The relevant approvals and transactions arising from the proposed
divestiture were consequently cancelled and declared null and void.
The ruling effectively means that the government retains the
15 per cent stake in Safaricom on behalf of the Kenyan people.

Join the Discussion
Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.
No comments yet
This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!