AG to Treasury: Stop collection of Ksh.50 eCitizen convenience fee

Dzuya Walter
By Dzuya Walter November 26, 2025 11:58 (EAT)
AG to Treasury: Stop collection of Ksh.50 eCitizen convenience fee

Attorney General Dorcas Oduor during a past meeting in her office. PHOTO | COURTESY

Vocalize Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Vocalize

The Attorney General has advised the Cabinet Secretary for Treasury and Economic Planning to comply with the orders issued by Justice Chacha Mwita halting the collection of the KSh50 e-Citizen convenience fee.

This directive follows a recent decision by the Court of Appeal, which dismissed the respondents’ application for a stay of execution of the April 1, 2025 judgment. The effect of the dismissal is that the High Court orders remain in force and must be adhered to as the appeal proceeds.

AG Dorcas Oduor, in response to a contempt of court proceedings against Treasury CS John Mbadi, issued the advisory while responding to a contempt of court application filed by Dr. Benjamin Magare Gikenyi, who accused several senior government officials of disobeying Justice Mwita’s judgment stopping the imposition of the Ksh.50 charge on e-Citizen transactions.

In his response, the Attorney General acknowledged that the government had taken active steps to challenge the judgment through an appeal. However, he emphasized that the respondents remain bound by the court’s directives unless and until the judgment is overturned.

According to the AG, the state officers have demonstrated good faith and taken measures toward compliance despite being dissatisfied with the ruling. He added that the respondents were guided by the constitutional principle of the rule of law under Article 10, and had continued to adjust operations on the e-Citizen platform accordingly.

Dr. Magare’s application sought to cite several Cabinet Secretaries and senior public officers for contempt, arguing that they had continued to charge Kenyans the Ksh.50 fee in violation of the High Court order. He insisted that this amounted to deliberate disobedience and undermined judicial authority.

In his reply, however, the AG maintained that the government had already begun aligning the platform with the court’s judgment, noting that certain administrative steps including the re-allocation of votes and system adjustments require time due to statutory procedures.


Join the Discussion

Share your perspective with the Citizen Digital community.

Moderation applies

Sign In to Publish

No comments yet

This discussion is waiting for your voice. Be the first to share your thoughts!