South Korea's parliament presses for Yoon's removal as impeachment trial winds down
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9edf/f9edf7e38e477d0c34cab07a5c276470302e6d64" alt="South Korea's parliament presses for Yoon's removal as impeachment trial winds down South Korea's parliament presses for Yoon's removal as impeachment trial winds down"
Judges of the Constitutional Court attend the impeachment trial of South Korea's impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol at the Constitutional Court in Seoul, South Korea, February 18, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji/Pool
South Korean President Yoon Suk
Yeol could try to impose martial law again or undermine constitutional
institutions should he be reinstated, lawyers for parliament argued on Tuesday
as his impeachment trial entered its final phase.
After weeks of testimony by
high-ranking current and former officials, including some facing criminal
charges for their role in the brief imposition of martial law on December 3,
lawyers for both sides summarised their arguments and evidence at the
Constitutional Court.
"Declaring martial law in a
situation that doesn't fit a national emergency is a declaration of
dictatorship and military rule," Kim Jin-han, a lawyer for the parliament,
told the justices.
He cited pro-Yoon protesters who
stormed a different court in January.
"If he returns to work, we
don't know if he will again exercise martial law," Kim said. "If he
returns to work, we can't rule out the possibility that he will attack other
state and constitutional institutions."
The Constitutional Court is due
to hold another hearing to question three more witnesses on Thursday, including
the impeached prime minister and the former police chief.
The court is reviewing
parliament's impeachment of Yoon on December 14 and will decide whether to
remove him from office permanently or reinstate him. If he is removed, a new
presidential election must be held within 60 days.
Yoon has argued that he had a
right as president to issue his martial law decree, which lasted around six
hours before he rescinded it in the face of parliamentary opposition. He said
the move was also justified by political deadlock and threats from
"anti-state forces" sympathetic to North Korea.
His case at the Constitutional
Court has also included arguments that he never actually intended to stop
parliament from operating, even though the order was publicly declared and
troops and police were deployed to the legislature.
Yoon also sent troops to the
National Election Commission and later said the decree was necessary in part
because the NEC had been unwilling to address concerns over election hacking, a
claim rejected by election officials.
Prosecutors have also indicted
Yoon on separate criminal charges of leading an insurrection. He was arrested
last month and is being held at a detention centre.
The first preparatory hearing in
that case is scheduled for Thursday.
Insurrection is one of the few
criminal charges from which a South Korean president does not have immunity. It
is punishable by life imprisonment or death, although South Korea has not
executed anyone in decades.
Want to send us a story? SMS to 25170 or WhatsApp 0743570000 or Submit on Citizen Digital or email wananchi@royalmedia.co.ke
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a Comment