Judge gives Trump until Friday to explain why he wants a special master for Mar-a-Lago documents
Audio By Vocalize
A
federal judge in Florida has given former President Donald Trump until Friday
to refine the legal arguments in his request for a special master to oversee the review of
evidence gathered in the Mar-a-Lago search.
District
Court Judge Aileen Cannon in the Southern District of Florida ordered Trump's
lawyers to elaborate on their arguments for why the court has the ability to
step in at this time, explain what exactly Trump is asking for and whether the
Justice Department has been served with Trump's special master motion.
Cannon
also asked Trump's team to weigh in on any effect the request might have on a
separate review conducted by a magistrate judge into whether any portions of
the still-sealed FBI affidavit laying out probable cause for the search can be
released.
The
judge's order showcases many of the ways that the complaint filed by Trump fell
short of what would have been expected of a court submission asking for the
appointment of a special master-- particularly in a search as high-stakes as
the one FBI executed at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month
"What's
she saying is, 'What are you doing in front of me?'" Mark Schnapp, a
criminal defense lawyer in Florida who spent seven years working for the US
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, told CNN.
Generally speaking, it is not outside the legal norm for
Trump to want a special master involved in the review of the evidence seized
from his Florida residence. His former lawyer, Michael Cohen successfully
sought the appointment of a special master when Cohen's office and residences
were searched by the FBI in 2018.
But Trump waited two weeks to make such a request, raising
eyebrows because of how far along in the process the Justice Department likely
is in reviewing what it seized at Mar-a-Lago. (For the review, the Justice
Department is using what's known as "taint team," which is a group of
prosecutors not working on the probe in question who filter out materials that
should not be handed over to investigators.)
And
when Trump did file his request with the court, the complaint leaned heavily
into political accusations, while being light on the sort of legal discussion
that would explain to a court why it should intervene and what authority it had
to do so. When Trump's lawyers did cite the court rules they said gave the
judge the authority to grant the request, they cited the rules of civil
procedure, without any explanation for why those rules should be applied in a context
concerning a criminal search warrant.
Trump
also did not file with the complaint the kind of separate request -- such as a
motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction -- that
would have sped up the timeline for the judge to consider what Trump was asking
for.
Nor
did Trump's legal team file any declarations -- i.e. statements from the
lawyers who were said to have interacted with the Justice Department in the
lead-up and after the search -- to back up the complaint's factual assertions.
Instead,
the complaint retread allegations about the FBI's investigation into Russia's
2016 election interference, while sensationally suggesting that the DOJ's
actions were motivated by a desire to hinder a Trump 2024 presidential run. It
also included the full text of a warning Trump supposedly sought to deliver
through his lawyers to Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Schnapp
said Trump's filing Monday read more like a political message than a legal
document.
"They
really didn't ask for anything. That's the craziness," Schnapp said.
"They didn't ask for anything to be done in the immediate future to slow
it down, even though that's what they claimed to be doing"
Trump's
move to file a separate case that was assigned to Judge Cannon, rather than
file the request with the magistrate judge who signed off on the warrant, also
prompted confusion among outside legal experts. It appears that Trump's lawyers
even ran into procedural issues with the filing of the lawsuit and with their
attempts to enter appearances in the case.
The
clerk posted one notice on the docket indicating that the complaint had been
"filed conventionally" when it "should have been filed
electronically," according to the court's local rules.
Another
notice from the clerk indicated that the Trump attorneys who were seeking
special admission to enter appearances in the case because they were not barred
in Florida also failed to follow the local rules in doing so. They were given
another chance to enter their appearances correctly.


Leave a Comment