Four reasons why prosecution wants Ian Njoroge denied bail in police assault case
Police assault suspect Ian Njoroge arraigned at the Milimani Law Courts on June 4, 2024. PHOTO | COURTESY | ODPP
Audio By Vocalize
The prosecution team handling the case of Ian
Ngige Njoroge, the 19-year-old motorist who went viral after roughing up a
traffic police officer in Mirema on Sunday, has filed an affidavit opposing
his release on bail.
In the affidavit signed by DCI Investigating
Officer Josephat Rotich, the prosecution, among other things, cited the
imminent threat to Njoroge's safety owing to the intense public outcry that
ensued following the incident.
"That due to the publicity of the
matter, the situation on the ground is hostile towards the accused person.
There is imminent danger to the accused person due to public agitation,"
Rotich said in the affidavit.
The prosecution further highlighted the
potential for Njoroge to tamper with witnesses if he were to be released.
"There is a likelihood of the accused
person to interfere with major witnesses. Some of whom were captured through
social media and are physically well known to the accused," the
prosecution argued.
Additionally, Rotich underscored that Njoroge
never turned himself in after assaulting the police officer, indicating that he
poses a flight risk.
"After the incident the accused person
didn't report to the station but he instead went into hiding until he was
sought by officers and arrested from his hiding place. Therefore he is a flight
risk," the DCI investigating officer said.
Rotich added that the police officer attacked
by Njoroge also wants to testify before the suspect is granted bail.
"The complainant who is 57 years old
feels victimized on social media and requests to testify before the accused is
released. I am aware that bail and bond are constitutional right but the same
can be denied if there are compelling reasons," he said.
"I have been informed by the counsel
handling the information which I believe is true that the reasons given are
compelling enough so as to deny the respondent person bond."


Leave a Comment