AG opposes auction of Matili Institute's assets by private developer
A man stands at the Matili Technical Training Institute gate. PHOTO | COURTESY
Audio By Vocalize
The High Court in Bungoma has certified as urgent an application filed by the Office of the Attorney General seeking to stop the auction of properties belonging to the Matili Technical Training Institute.
The planned auction
threatens the studies of over 10,000 students, whose fate now hangs in the
balance as the institution faces imminent closure.
On Monday, Lady
Justice Rose Ougo of the Bungoma High Court certified the case as urgent and
ordered that it be served immediately, with all parties filing responses within
three days. The parties were ordered to appear before the court on May 27,
2025, to set a hearing date.
In the warrants of
attachment served on the college on Wednesday, April 30, and seen by Citizen Digital, the
contractor seeks to acquire the institution's assets, including training tools
and equipment, all electronic devices, power generators, and foodstuffs
procured for students for the entire school term to repay a debt of Ksh.15.6
million, citing a High Court judgment delivered on January 15, 2024.
In the High Court
ruling, the contractor was awarded Ksh.15.4 million for outstanding debt
arrears accruing for payment for the completion of a Twin Workshop Complex at
Matili Technical Training Institute.
The Attorney
General moved to the High Court on Friday, seeking orders to temporarily
suspend the High Court's judgment, citing the discovery of new evidence by the
Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) which indicated that the debt is
non-existent and involves theft of public funds.
In the court papers
filed under a certificate of urgency, the Office of the Attorney General,
through Deputy Chief State Counsel Stafford Nyauma, told the court that
investigations conducted by the EACC revealed that the contractor was actually
paid the alleged outstanding debt of Ksh.9,071,000 in installments between 2016
and 2017.
The AG stated that
by the time the claim was filed, the debt had been fully paid, rendering the
contractor's claim fraudulent and constituting a blatant theft of public funds.
“The institution
currently caters for over 10,000 students from all corners of the Republic. Any
disruption of its activities would cause a ripple effect beyond the
institution's boundaries, prejudicing the right to education and the public
interest,” the AG said in court papers.
“It is apparent
that the respondent took advantage of the honorable court and conspired with
the previous Board of Management of the TVET institution to conceal evidence of
payment, and subsequently sued the institution claiming payment of a
non-existent debt, as disclosed by the Interested Party (EACC) in their joinder
application.”
The Attorney
General sought the court orders to halt the implementation of the judgment
pending the hearing of an application by EACC seeking to be enjoined in the
suit as an interested party to introduce the new evidence.
“The Interested
Party has since filed an application for joinder herein dated March 18, 2025,
which is pending determination before this Honourable Court and is fixed for
mention on June 19, 2025, where the Interested Party avers that pursuant to its
mandate, it received and conducted investigations into allegations of
corruption, theft of public funds and fraudulent conduct in respect to the
tender for the Erection and Completion of a Twin Workshop Complex at Matili
Technical Training Institute awarded to the Respondent herein at
Ksh.58,997,852/=, which is the basis of the instant claim,” noted the State Law
Office.
The AG's office
also claimed that the contractor schemed with the institution's previous board
of management to conceal evidence of payment and opted to sue the institution
to receive a non-existent debt.
“Due to the
Interested Party’s findings, it is clear that the Respondent took advantage of
the Honourable Court and conspired with the previous Board of Management of the
TVET Institute to conceal evidence of payment and purported to sue the
institution claiming payment of a non-existent debt as disclosed by the
Interested Party in their Joinder application,” added court papers.


Leave a Comment