Scandal looms in Parliament over payment of millions to ghost workers
Security is the most visible feature of Parliament buildings. This is one of the most secured government installations in the country. Gaining entry into the current complex requires one to go through many layers of security checks.
For
its manned security checkpoints, parliament relies on layers of security
personnel drawn from different security formations…the most visible are the
officers from the sergeant at arms office…they take care of both the physical
and ceremonial security protocols around the speaker, members, the clerk and
other staff of the National Assembly.
According
to insiders, the security layering brings on board the regular police in
uniform and plain clothes, with retinues of personal bodyguards and even
informal security aides completing the crowded security set-up.
Our
sources will go by fictitious code names Charlie Bravo I and Charlie Bravo II.
“The
current setup in security the nature of the multi-agency teams, we have firstly
the sergeant at arms in both houses, National Assembly and senate all they do
is security work, in addition, we have in-house parliament security and safety
team,” says Charlie Bravo I.
“Parliament
has gone ahead and hired national police as a third party as service providers,
it compounds the confusion, it was not informed by any scientific research we
have the Kenya police station, we have the GSU, a platoon, the RDU, the
administration police unit, we have the Ap and the bodyguards.”
According
to the insiders, these different security outfits at Parliament have been
operating in an uncoordinated manner, with no central command.
“Hakuna
command in leadership, kumaanisha kitU ikitokea God forbid hakutakuwa na mtu wa
kutoa leadership kwanza sababu kila Mtu anaangalia watu wake, GSU anaangalia
watu wake, polisi wa station anaangalia watu wake kivwake, AP wako kivyao, na
sisi pia tuko kivyetu,” Charlie Bravo II says.
The
situation is further compounded by what the two say is the lack of a proper
hierarchy and schemes of service for the officers serving especially under the
parliamentary joint services unit, there is also the challenge of what they say
is a top-heavy deployment even for duties that are essentially meant for the
lower levels of security officers.
Our
sources say this and what they term as a bloated security force means that
nearly half the number of officers on the roll either do very little of what
they are meant to do or are simply ghost workers.
“As security,
we are trained to be lean effective teams, so the opposite is an ineffective
team where half of the team does not work completely they believe the other
half will do it, the bystander attitude …the other half is doing it becomes
discouraged…there is not motivation,” says the first whistleblower.
Our
sources admit, that they fall under the ghost workers category often they do
not show up for duty, and no one notices their absence, but they still get paid.
The
presence of deceased officers, those who have been transferred out but are
still on the payroll also raised questions on the sanctity of the security
payroll in parliament.
Indeed,
one such incident is evidenced by communication from the DCI instructing the
chief security and safety officer of the PSC to remove a deceased corporal who
had been seconded to the PSC from their records.
The
letter to this effect was sent in September 2022, the officer had been deceased
in 2022, meaning for two years, allowances were paid out to the deceased
corporal’s name, this isn’t the only irregularity in the payroll for allowances
paid out to security for parliament.
”Any
list of security teams irrespective it must be broken down into pf numbers,
rank and name the payroll in parliament does not have rank, which is a direct
breach secondly the pf number is cluttered in the sense that some beneficiaries
have service numbers, other IFMIS numbers, you can’t rule out ghost workers,”
says Charlie Bravo I.
The
second whistleblower adds; “Tuko na wale maofisa ambao bunge inalipa, wale 1400 police officers na
ukiangali saa his na kazi iliyoko, wale wako kazini hawawezi pita hata mia nne.”
“This
armed element national police is over bloated, and in addition to that there
are ghost workers on the roll, we have members of the force that are dead, that
are posted out and are still on the roll…this is not disputed,” Charlie Bravo I
further states.
This
payroll costs the taxpayer Ksh.30.7 million per month in allowances paid for
amongst other things, administration police, top-up allowances, overtime, rapid
deployment, speakers security, CID GSU allowance and dog section allowances…and
even in this canine unit, the whistleblowers allege irregularities exist.
“Dog
section has a contingent of dogs and handlers, on the payroll we have a list of
15 and yet on the daily we have no more than five dogs…where are the other
numbers deployed…from the causal eye, the rest of the dogs and handlers are
ghosts, they never report,” the first whistleblower says.
The
whistleblowers contend that unless these issues are resolved, even as
parliamentarians seek to move to their new offices, the challenge of security will
still persist.
We
reached out to the Speaker of the National Assembly, the clerk of the National
Assembly and the Director of the Parliamentary Joint Services for comment on
this issue. Our efforts were not successful.
Want to send us a story? SMS to 25170 or WhatsApp 0743570000 or Submit on Citizen Digital or email wananchi@royalmedia.co.ke
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a Comment